Emerging Markets as Opportunities, Rather than Threats |
Без темы | ||
<< Eliza Malek | ENGR 100 - Robotics Project >> |
![]() Emerging Markets as Opportunities, Rather than Threats |
![]() AGENDA |
![]() AGENDA |
![]() AGENDA |
![]() AGENDA |
![]() AGENDA |
![]() MAIN OPPORTUNITIES FOR REGULATED MARKET PLAYERS |
|||
Автор: Thomas J. Vaichus. Чтобы познакомиться с картинкой полного размера, нажмите на её эскиз. Чтобы можно было использовать все картинки для урока английского языка, скачайте бесплатно презентацию «Emerging Markets as Opportunities, Rather than Threats.ppt» со всеми картинками в zip-архиве размером 233 КБ.
Сл | Текст | Сл | Текст |
1 | Emerging Markets as Opportunities, | 16 | handholding and close monitoring |
Rather than Threats. KATE KUHRT DCAT Week | FDA-approval doesn’t necessarily mean | ||
MARCH 12, 2008. | consistent quality Risk of technology | ||
2 | IS YOUR EMPLOYER ALREADY PRESENT IN | theft Environmental issues Language | |
EMERGING MARKETS? Yes No, but we are | barriers. | ||
considering entering emerging markets. No. | 17 | MARKETS FOR DOSE: Russia. Big | |
We are not considering entering emerging | Pharma/Small Innovators Roche, | ||
markets at this time. | Sanofi-Aventis, Novartis, Nycomed, Pfizer, | ||
3 | WHERE DO YOU SEE MOST OPPORTUNITIES | Menarini, Servier Generics Lek, Gedeon, | |
FOR YOUR COMPANY? India China Japan North | Krka – for decades Stada, Pliva, | ||
America South America Eastern Europe | Polpharma, Actavis. | ||
Western Europe Russia Other regions. | 18 | MARKETS FOR DOSE: Russia. Pros Growing | |
4 | BACKDROP. Growth Expectations for 2008 | middle class Demand for treatments for | |
US and EU5: 4-5% Japan: 1-2% BRIC: 12-13% | chronic diseases No alternative therapies | ||
Brand pharma Innovation slump Blockbusters | Obligatory health insurance Few local dose | ||
losing patent protection Generics | companies with cGMP experience Market | ||
Increasing competition, especially from | dominated by imports. Cons Size of the | ||
India Low cost API coming from India, | country Poor infrastructure Fragmented | ||
China Margin pressures in U.S., UK, | distribution network IP enforcement | ||
Germany Drop in small molecule | Counterfeiting Controlled pricing Gov’t | ||
opportunities post-2011. | debt to pharma cos Red tape Protectionist | ||
5 | AGENDA. Players Big Pharma Generics | measures by government. | |
based in regulated markets API | 19 | MARKETS FOR API: Russia. Pros Almost | |
manufacturers based in regulated markets | all API is imported Little local | ||
Areas of opportunity: Dose and API sales | production Little local expertise outside | ||
R&D and Manufacturing base. | of supplements Local products w/ | ||
6 | MARKET FOR DOSE: India. Big Pharma Has | inconsistent quality Large number of local | |
been there for years: J&J, Wyeth, | dose companies. Cons A lot of the API is | ||
Pfizer, AZ, Glaxo, Lilly, Abbott, others | coming from India, China Many local dose | ||
Generics Baxter: Leader in IV solutions | companies buy from offshore distributors | ||
market in India Mylan: Matrix acquisition | Suspect quality Red tape. | ||
motivated only by access to API? Teva: | 20 | R&D AND MANUFACTURING BASE: | |
Perennial rumors about a major Indian | Russia. Innovators: Servier: dose plant | ||
acquisition. | near Moscow Nycomed, Glaxo, Pfizer? | ||
7 | MARKET FOR DOSE: India. Pros | Generics: Stada: Nizhpharm, Makiz group | |
Double-digit pharma market growth Economic | (Makiz, Skopinpharm and Biodyne | ||
boom Growing middle-class Increasing | Pharmaceuticals) Actavis: ZiO Zdorovje | ||
prevalence of Western diseases 2005 | Krka: Production facility in near Moscow | ||
product patents. Cons Challenges to | Polpharma/Gedeon: Akrihin. | ||
product patents Novartis’s Glivec | 21 | R&D AND MANUFACTURING BASE: | |
Potential for compulsory licensing Roche’s | Russia. Pros Low-cost production Platform | ||
Tarceva Many people still lack access to | for launching into CIS, E Europe Biotech | ||
pharmaceuticals Poor infrastructure Large | and immunology experience Large clinical | ||
number of backward integrated local | trial population Physicians eager to | ||
generic drug companies Dose imports from | participate in trials Low cost of clinical | ||
China Low prices Restrictive import duty | trials. Cons Erosion of formerly strong | ||
on finished dose products Need marketing | scientific base Poor enforcement of IP | ||
presence. | rights Counterfeiting Limited number of | ||
8 | MARKETS FOR API: India ~1200 Indian | sites with GMP experience Red tape | |
Import Registrations filed since Feb 2003. | Economic and political risks Language | ||
EU/US based companies with most IIRs DSM | barriers. | ||
BASF Schering-Plough Sanofi Novartis | 22 | MARKETS FOR DOSE: Brazil. Big Pharma | |
Pfizer Bayer E.ON Glaxo. Products with | Abbott, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Pfizer, | ||
most Euro/US IIRs Amoxicillin Clavulanate | others Generics Sandoz: only foreign | ||
Potassium Pancreatin Beta Carotene | generic co in top five Apotex: exiting the | ||
Lactulose. Source: Newport Horizon. | Brazilian market Teva: future plans? | ||
9 | MARKET FOR API: India. Pros Not | 23 | MARKETS FOR DOSE: Brazil. Pros Largest |
self-sufficient in all products | population in Latin America Rapid market | ||
Fermentation Steroids Prostaglandins | growth Ageing population Gov’t efforts to | ||
Polypeptides Demand for Intermediates | improve health care Gov’t efforts to | ||
Costs rising in China and India | increase generics’ uptake Opportunities | ||
Opportunities in high-quality API for | with high-value specialty products. Cons | ||
export dose. Cons Abundance of locally | Price controls Frequent, abrupt changes of | ||
manufactured API Many local facilities FDA | rules Lack of transparency Views toward IP | ||
approved Extensive importing from China | Efavirenz CL Generic market highly | ||
Local API manufacturers enjoy cost | concentrated Top four players: 80% | ||
advantage Restrictive duty on API imports. | Domestic players dominate Fierce | ||
10 | R&D AND MANUFACTURING BASE: India. | competition Need local manufacturing to be | |
Big Pharma Many have R&D and | viable. | ||
manufacturing sites in India: Novo | 24 | MARKETS FOR API: Brazil. Pros Most of | |
Nordisk, Merck, Pfizer, others Generics | API is imported Low import taxes Dose | ||
Sandoz: a number of units Teva: small | companies becoming more quality minded | ||
API/intermediates plant and R&D | Regulatory environment becoming tougher | ||
facility Apotex: manufacturing and R&D | Dose exports into neighboring countries | ||
facilities Mylan: Matrix acquisition API | Opportunities in High-quality hormones | ||
Manufacturers Trifarma: Alchymars ICM | Controlled substances. Cons Currently most | ||
Albany Molecular: FineKem, Ariane | API imports from India and China Still | ||
Orgachem. | heavy focus on cost rather than quality | ||
11 | R&D AND MANUFACTURING BASE: India. | Strong Euro. | |
Pros Scientific talent Significant cost | 25 | R&D AND MANUFACTURING BASE: | |
saving opportunities Proven abilities in | Brazil. Big Pharma Manufacturing base: | ||
IT arena Product patents introduced in | Novartis, Roche, GSK, Janssen, Eli Lilly, | ||
2005 100% Foreign Direct Investment | Abbott Ongoing clinical trials: BMS, | ||
permitted Huge treatment-na?ve patient | Pfizer, Roche Generics Sandoz: upgrading | ||
population A number of sites with | its manufacturing plant in Sao Paulo | ||
experience with submitting data to FDA | Apotex: looking to sell the plant in Sao | ||
Large English-speaking population. Cons | Paulo API Manufacturers Italfarmaco ACS | ||
Costs increasing IP Issues Long-distance | Dobfar DSM. | ||
management Infrastructure FDA-approval | 26 | R&D AND MANUFACTURING BASE: | |
doesn’t necessarily mean consistent | Brazil. Pros Biotech legislation | ||
quality and cGMP compliance. | Biodiversity and phytotherapeutics | ||
12 | MARKETS FOR DOSE: China. Big Pharma | Platform for exporting into rest of Latin | |
Has been there for years: Abbott, | America Large treatment-na?ve population | ||
AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli | Seasonal diseases 6-months out-of-synch | ||
Lilly, J&J, Novartis, others Generics | with North America/Europe. Cons | ||
Baxter Actavis: Actavis (Foshan) | Historically not strong in R&D | ||
Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Stada: Health | Frequent, abrupt changes of rules Slow | ||
Vision Enterprise, Stada Pharmaceuticals | administrative processes Weak local API | ||
(Beijing) Sandoz: Guangdong Sandoz | industry Language barrier. | ||
Pharmaceutical Company Teva: Tianjin | 27 | MARKETS FOR DOSE: Japan. Big Pharma | |
Hualida Biotechnology Pharmaceutical | Abbott, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, | ||
(Sicor), Kunming Baker Norton (Ivax). | others Generics Mylan: Merck Kgaa Sandoz: | ||
13 | MARKETS FOR DOSE: China. Cons Size of | Hexal Hospira: agreement with Taiyo Teva: | |
the country Fragmented market Many people | aggressive plans for 2008. | ||
still lack access to medicines Many | 28 | MARKETS FOR DOES: Japan. Pros World’s | |
government regulations that can slow down | second largest pharma market Ageing | ||
registration Competition from local | population All manufacturing can be done | ||
players Must partner with local companies | outside Japan Government aims to increase | ||
to get access to distribution channels | the market share of generics Incentives | ||
Many Chinese companies active in | New Rx form Increasing use of OTC drugs. | ||
individual provinces only Not all drugs | Cons Slow approval process Price | ||
currently sold in China Generics may need | cuts/reduced reimbursement Slow overall | ||
to conduct clinical trials. Pros Expected | growth of market Low image of generics | ||
to be the 5th largest pharma market by | Generics must provide every | ||
2010 Growing middle class Increasing life | dosage/formulation Requirement for a | ||
expectancy Increasing awareness of | nationwide distribution network Difficult | ||
diseases and treatments Increasing | for foreign companies to do it alone | ||
prevalence of Western diseases Demand for | Underdeveloped framework for patent | ||
cardiovascular, dermatological, oncology, | challenges. | ||
pediatric drugs. | 29 | MARKETS FOR API: Japan ~2000 JDMFs | |
14 | MARKETS FOR API: China. Pros Rising | filed since Feb 2005. EU/US based | |
costs in China Demand for difficult to | companies with most JDMFs Sanofi-Aventis | ||
manufacture APIs “nibs” Demand for | Cambrex Schering-Plough Novartis DSM | ||
high-quality API from dedicated facilities | Pfizer BASF Merck & Co Erregierre FIS. | ||
Newer cephalosporins. Cons China has | Products with most Euro/US JDMFs Heparin | ||
manpower, intellect and raw materials to | Mesalamine Terbinafine Omeprazole | ||
manufacture most products locally Heavy | Itraconazole. Source: Newport Horizon. | ||
focus on cost Importing from low-cost | 30 | MARKETS FOR API: Japan. Pros Most dose | |
countries High-value of Euro. | companies do not make their own API | ||
15 | R&D AND MANUFACTURING BASE: China. | Introduction of JDMFs New DMF and | |
Big Pharma AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, | accreditation system discouraging certain | ||
Glaxo, BMS, Schering, Novartis, others | players from less regulated markets | ||
Generics Perrigo: Zibo Xinhua-Perrigo | Harmonization of rules CTD can be used as | ||
Pharmaceutical Company Watson: R&D and | the basis for a DMF. Cons Different | ||
manufacturing in Changzhou City Sandoz: | standards Relatively small volumes JDMF | ||
Guangdong Sandoz Pharmaceutical Company | system still new Reliance on agents and | ||
Teva: Hualida Biotech Baxter: at least | well-established relationships Language | ||
four manufacturing facilities API | barrier Many Japanese generics buying from | ||
Manufacturers DSM: R&D, manufacturing | India, China, South Korea Competition from | ||
Esteve: Zhejiang Huayi Pharmaceutical | Japanese fine chemical companies. | ||
Lonza: R&D, manufacturing Hovione: | 31 | MAIN OPPORTUNITIES FOR REGULATED | |
Zhejiang Hisyn. | MARKET PLAYERS. ? ? Pharma: Dose. | ||
16 | R&D AND MANUFACTURING BASE: China. | Generics: Dose. API Sales. R&D. | |
Pros Talented pool of scientists, | Manufacturing. India. China. Russia. | ||
engineers Lower cost base Base for selling | Brazil. Japan. | ||
into other emerging markets Improving | 32 | THANK YOU! Kate Kuhrt Director, | |
intellectual property protection | Generics and API Intelligence Thomson | ||
Infrastructure Government support for | Reuters 215 Commercial Street Portland, | ||
R&D Large treatment-na?ve population. | Maine 04101 USA + 1 (207) 871-9700 x26 | ||
Cons Increasing prices Need for | kate.kuhrt@thomsonreuters.com. | ||
Emerging Markets as Opportunities, Rather than Threats.ppt |
«Предлоги в английском» - Предлоги места. Prepositions. Fill in the gaps with the right preposition of time. Предлоги. Предлоги в английском. Emma left school ten years ago. Предлоги и их перевод. Practice. Keys. Mr and Mrs Kelly have been married since 1978. My cousin often visits me on her holidays. Предлоги времени. I usually finish work at 5.30.
«Устный экзамен по английскому языку» - Кабинет иностранного языка и экзамен. Беседа по ситуации. Тема районных (городских МО) и экзамен. Экзаменационная комиссия. Восприятие речи на слух. Чтение. Обязательный устный экзамен по английскому языку. Уровень сформированности коммуникативной компетенции. Коммуникативная компетенция. Порядок проведения экзамена.
«Англицизмы в современном русском языке» - Пищевые продукты. Значения названий. Игры. Названия фирм и предприятий. Что такое Comet. Моющие средства. Что такое Starburst. Марки машин. Изучение и анализ литературы. Влияние англоязычных названий. Кинофильмы. Выявить влияние англоязычных названий. В ходе исследования были опрошены учащиеся 4 и 6 классов.
«Places in London» - Достопримечательности Лондона. Crown Jewels. The City. London is very rich in museums and art galleries. The City of London. The Queen's Residence. The West End. St.James's Park. Buckingham Palace. Урок. The best place in world. The East End. Tower of London. Trafalgar Square. River Thames. The famous places in the London.
«Winter» - In winter we have long holidays. In winter there are many funny games. I like winter! I like New Year because I usually get many presents. We go to sledge, ski and skate. I like winter because it’s snowy and frosty. In winter I like to ski with my father (mother, sister, friends). Play snowballs Ski Skate Make snowman.
«Русский и английский» - The girl who played the piano. Средства выражения категории степени качества. Лекция 3. В рус. яз. категория рода представлена наличием трех родов: муж., жен., ср. Критерии отбора показателей типологического сопоставления. Слова, имеющие только сему множественности и совпадающие в обоих языках (существительные обозначающие парные предметы): ножницы – scissors; весы – scales; очки – spectacles; щипцы – tongs; кандалы - fetters.